<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zoning As Theft</title>
	<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2006/03/22/zoning-as-theft/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 09:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Zoning As Theft</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2006/03/22/zoning-as-theft/#comment-45931</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2006/03/22/zoning-as-theft/#comment-45931</guid>
					<description>[...] This is the cached version of  http://www.yazadjal.com/2006/03/22/zoning-as-theft/   We are neither affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its content.     Zoning As Theft  The Mises Institute has a thought provoking article on zoning, comparing it to theft. Zoning uses all the standard interventionist lines of thought, most notably the concepts of externalities and utility. Those who advocate zoning really believe that acting man does not have the ability to create communities that are functional and prosperous. Without plans and [...]    Wed, 22 Mar 2006 16:11:56 +0000 in Environment &amp;#160;on&amp;#160; yazadjal.com &amp;#160;&amp;#160;     http://www.yazadjal.com/2006/03/22/zoning-as-theft/ &amp;#160;-&amp;#160;  Original Article [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] This is the cached version of  <a href='http://www.yazadjal.com/2006/03/22/zoning-as-theft/' rel='nofollow'>http://www.yazadjal.com/2006/03/22/zoning-as-theft/</a>   We are neither affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its content.     Zoning As Theft  The Mises Institute has a thought provoking article on zoning, comparing it to theft. Zoning uses all the standard interventionist lines of thought, most notably the concepts of externalities and utility. Those who advocate zoning really believe that acting man does not have the ability to create communities that are functional and prosperous. Without plans and [&#8230;]    Wed, 22 Mar 2006 16:11:56 +0000 in Environment &nbsp;on&nbsp; yazadjal.com &nbsp;&nbsp;     <a href='http://www.yazadjal.com/2006/03/22/zoning-as-theft/' rel='nofollow'>http://www.yazadjal.com/2006/03/22/zoning-as-theft/</a> &nbsp;-&nbsp;  Original Article [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: AB</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2006/03/22/zoning-as-theft/#comment-22527</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2006/03/22/zoning-as-theft/#comment-22527</guid>
					<description>I'll go further in the analysis: zoning forbids people to buy certain rights, it is theft only for the person who owned the home when the laws were passed. If the laws were repelled tomorrow, you still couldn't build a peep-show next to the school, because the State prevented you to buy the right to do. This, in itself is of course coercive, but the deed is done, you didn't buy the right. This raises the question of who now owns that right? I think that right has been destroyed, much like property can be destroyed, waste can be destroyed etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll go further in the analysis: zoning forbids people to buy certain rights, it is theft only for the person who owned the home when the laws were passed. If the laws were repelled tomorrow, you still couldn&#8217;t build a peep-show next to the school, because the State prevented you to buy the right to do. This, in itself is of course coercive, but the deed is done, you didn&#8217;t buy the right. This raises the question of who now owns that right? I think that right has been destroyed, much like property can be destroyed, waste can be destroyed etc.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: AB</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2006/03/22/zoning-as-theft/#comment-22484</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2006/03/22/zoning-as-theft/#comment-22484</guid>
					<description>The problem with breaking zoning laws is that people expect them to be enforced.
In the absence of coercive zoning laws, there would be free market arrangement that would legitimately create zoning laws. 

Two guys buy houses close to each other, the first one plants a huge tree in his garden making shadow on the other guy's garden. The other guy is sad.

Forecasting that scenario, an intelligent investor would have bought the two houses, and sold them by witholding some rights, such as planting big shadow making trees. By doing that, he is able to make a profit, the legitimate regulation he created added value to the land.

Now assume there is zoning law, you and your neighbor buy houses, you cannot plant big trees. The zoning laws are repelled, you plant a big tree, your neighbor is unhappy.

Sure, if you look at it, repelling zoning laws is the only ethical thing to do, but to be quite honest, that is a tiny bit unfair to people who bought property. On consequential grounds, it's not really that good. Zoning laws should be phased out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with breaking zoning laws is that people expect them to be enforced.<br />
In the absence of coercive zoning laws, there would be free market arrangement that would legitimately create zoning laws. </p>
<p>Two guys buy houses close to each other, the first one plants a huge tree in his garden making shadow on the other guy&#8217;s garden. The other guy is sad.</p>
<p>Forecasting that scenario, an intelligent investor would have bought the two houses, and sold them by witholding some rights, such as planting big shadow making trees. By doing that, he is able to make a profit, the legitimate regulation he created added value to the land.</p>
<p>Now assume there is zoning law, you and your neighbor buy houses, you cannot plant big trees. The zoning laws are repelled, you plant a big tree, your neighbor is unhappy.</p>
<p>Sure, if you look at it, repelling zoning laws is the only ethical thing to do, but to be quite honest, that is a tiny bit unfair to people who bought property. On consequential grounds, it&#8217;s not really that good. Zoning laws should be phased out.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ajay</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2006/03/22/zoning-as-theft/#comment-15073</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2006/03/22/zoning-as-theft/#comment-15073</guid>
					<description>Keep it up.Thought provoking analysis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep it up.Thought provoking analysis.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ajay</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2006/03/22/zoning-as-theft/#comment-15072</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2006/03/22/zoning-as-theft/#comment-15072</guid>
					<description>We should look for solutons rather pointing fingers on others.How many real solution u have in your mind beside critising?I agree burecracy is worst in our country but I would say we as a society too lacking in opposing things which matters to us.See,US,Europe and other western countries how collectively they oppose even smaller issues.So, not only one organ ,goverment has lost its path but we too as individual too lost ,who always see short court rather fighting for justice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should look for solutons rather pointing fingers on others.How many real solution u have in your mind beside critising?I agree burecracy is worst in our country but I would say we as a society too lacking in opposing things which matters to us.See,US,Europe and other western countries how collectively they oppose even smaller issues.So, not only one organ ,goverment has lost its path but we too as individual too lost ,who always see short court rather fighting for justice.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Aditya Dash</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2006/03/22/zoning-as-theft/#comment-7882</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 02:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2006/03/22/zoning-as-theft/#comment-7882</guid>
					<description>you still did not adress the standard externality argument. The standard moral argument for classical liberal principles are usually pretty strong. Let me know if anyone has made a case by case analysis of zoning laws in India.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you still did not adress the standard externality argument. The standard moral argument for classical liberal principles are usually pretty strong. Let me know if anyone has made a case by case analysis of zoning laws in India.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gelf Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2006/03/22/zoning-as-theft/#comment-7864</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2006 01:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2006/03/22/zoning-as-theft/#comment-7864</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Exposing Corruption in India...&lt;/strong&gt;

An interview with Aniruddha Bahal of Cobrapost.com, who used hidden cameras to bring down 10 parliament members....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Exposing Corruption in India&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>An interview with Aniruddha Bahal of Cobrapost.com, who used hidden cameras to bring down 10 parliament members&#8230;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
