Comments on: The Short and Long of Economics http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/09/21/the-short-and-long-of-economics/ Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:34:38 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1 by: Leela (Green) ben http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/09/21/the-short-and-long-of-economics/#comment-4805 Fri, 28 Oct 2005 17:30:26 +0000 http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/09/21/the-short-and-long-of-economics/#comment-4805 nice blog. good reading. nice blog. good reading.

]]> by: jammy http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/09/21/the-short-and-long-of-economics/#comment-4745 Wed, 19 Oct 2005 17:32:33 +0000 http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/09/21/the-short-and-long-of-economics/#comment-4745 Mate...i think to understand how a good economy works you neednot look beyond Dubai. One cannot completely argue that they took the good path....but nobody caught them taking the bad path either! Mate…i think to understand how a good economy works you neednot look beyond Dubai. One cannot completely argue that they took the good path….but nobody caught them taking the bad path either!

]]> by: Bachelor http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/09/21/the-short-and-long-of-economics/#comment-4714 Sat, 15 Oct 2005 02:28:56 +0000 http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/09/21/the-short-and-long-of-economics/#comment-4714 Bring out the writer in you! Weave a story! Watch your story unfold with your fellow bloggers.New twists, new turns while this absurd fiction goes places. See your story through virtual eyes. Visit my blog for more details. www.bachelorblues.blogspot.com Bring out the writer in you! Weave a story! Watch your story unfold with your fellow bloggers.New twists, new turns while this absurd fiction goes places. See your story through virtual eyes.

Visit my blog for more details.

www.bachelorblues.blogspot.com

]]> by: Candyman http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/09/21/the-short-and-long-of-economics/#comment-4614 Mon, 03 Oct 2005 09:40:21 +0000 http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/09/21/the-short-and-long-of-economics/#comment-4614 WILLY WONKA’S GOLDEN TICKETS! DOMEAFAVORBUDDY-the world’s first online favors community is getting ready for launch. To celebrate this the team has come up with a little competition we’ve called WILLY WONKA’S GOLDEN TICKETS. We believe in the “6 degrees of separation theory” (Google it if you are not familiar, better still email Kevin Bacon!) The Game All the employees of DMAFB have set up multiple accounts with the top 10 free email providers. FOR YOU THERE ARE 2 STEPS 1. Register at http://www.domeafavorbuddy.com 2. Pass this email along to your friends with the title “WILLY WONKA’S GOLDEN TICKETS” If the theory is correct (ie everybody is connected by at least 6 people – For you lazy people out there) one or more of our employees should receive the email eventually. Whoever’s name appears as the ORIGINATOR of the email and is already registered at DMAFB wins an iPOD NANO, but there must be at least six people on the email list. It’s that simple! *DON’T PANIC! You still are eligible for other FREE PRIZES when you register at http://www.domeafvaorbuddy.com but it interesting to see how many friends some of you have. *[DON’T WORRY, The friends and family of DMAFB employees are exempt from this competition]! There’s no such thing as a free lunch you say? Who’s talking about lunch? WE’RE GIVING AWAY FREE IPODS! DO US A FAVOR by translating this email into your local language and passing it along. http://www.DOMEAFAVORBUDDY.COM ING SOON 2005… WILLY WONKA’S GOLDEN TICKETS!

DOMEAFAVORBUDDY-the world’s first online favors community is getting ready for launch.
To celebrate this the team has come up with a little competition we’ve called
WILLY WONKA’S GOLDEN TICKETS.
We believe in the “6 degrees of separation theory”
(Google it if you are not familiar, better still email Kevin Bacon!)

The Game

All the employees of DMAFB have set up multiple accounts with the top 10 free email providers.

FOR YOU THERE ARE 2 STEPS

1. Register at http://www.domeafavorbuddy.com
2. Pass this email along to your friends with the title
“WILLY WONKA’S GOLDEN TICKETS”

If the theory is correct (ie everybody is connected by at least 6 people – For you lazy people out there) one or more of our employees should receive the email eventually.

Whoever’s name appears as the ORIGINATOR of the email and is already registered at DMAFB wins an iPOD NANO, but there must be at least six people on the email list. It’s that simple!

*DON’T PANIC! You still are eligible for other FREE PRIZES when you register at http://www.domeafvaorbuddy.com but it interesting to see how many friends some of you have.

*[DON’T WORRY, The friends and family of DMAFB employees are exempt from this competition]!

There’s no such thing as a free lunch you say? Who’s talking about lunch? WE’RE GIVING AWAY FREE IPODS!

DO US A FAVOR by translating this email into your local language and passing it along.

http://www.DOMEAFAVORBUDDY.COM ING SOON 2005…

]]> by: DesiPundit » The Short And Long Of Economics http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/09/21/the-short-and-long-of-economics/#comment-4515 Sat, 24 Sep 2005 16:55:25 +0000 http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/09/21/the-short-and-long-of-economics/#comment-4515 [...] Kaushik Das, research ecomist with SBI Capital markets, guestblogging on AnarCapLib, conjures an intellectual treat on what else? [...] […] Kaushik Das, research ecomist with SBI Capital markets, guestblogging on AnarCapLib, conjures an intellectual treat on what else? […]

]]> by: vk http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/09/21/the-short-and-long-of-economics/#comment-4499 Fri, 23 Sep 2005 07:47:28 +0000 http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/09/21/the-short-and-long-of-economics/#comment-4499 Kaushik, Thanks for the nice post. I was under the impression that the rules vs discretion issue has been answered by Kydland and Prescott in favour of rules? The argument being that discretionary policy could lead to instability in outcomes, loss of credibility etc. Is there an alternative school of thought to this and a counter of some kind to their arguments? I am not a professional economist, so I don't know much about these matters, and would be glad to know your opinion. Kaushik,
Thanks for the nice post. I was under the impression that the rules vs discretion issue has been answered by Kydland and Prescott in favour of rules? The argument being that discretionary policy could lead to instability in outcomes, loss of credibility etc. Is there an alternative school of thought to this and a counter of some kind to their arguments? I am not a professional economist, so I don’t know much about these matters, and would be glad to know your opinion.

]]>