<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dinosaurs were big too</title>
	<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/05/13/dinosaurs-were-big-too/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Ramnath</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/05/13/dinosaurs-were-big-too/#comment-3487</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/05/13/dinosaurs-were-big-too/#comment-3487</guid>
					<description>&quot;Anti-globalisers and socialists demand special curbs on multinational corporations, saying these are far bigger than entire countries and so have too much power.&quot;

Another point. When we say MNCs are bigger than entire countries, we compare a company's topline with country's GDP. Not right. 

You calculate GDP by adding total &quot;value&quot; of output. So, the comparable figure for a company is actually its bottomline, because profit is a better measure of the value an organisation adds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Anti-globalisers and socialists demand special curbs on multinational corporations, saying these are far bigger than entire countries and so have too much power.&#8221;</p>
<p>Another point. When we say MNCs are bigger than entire countries, we compare a company&#8217;s topline with country&#8217;s GDP. Not right. </p>
<p>You calculate GDP by adding total &#8220;value&#8221; of output. So, the comparable figure for a company is actually its bottomline, because profit is a better measure of the value an organisation adds.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anup</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/05/13/dinosaurs-were-big-too/#comment-3488</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/05/13/dinosaurs-were-big-too/#comment-3488</guid>
					<description>I am not for bashing MNCs, but the example of Tata Motors and GM is not at all helpful. In FY04 Tata Motors total sales were Rs. 13000 crores or about 3 billion USD. AY 2004 sales for GM were about 193 billion dollars. GM tuned a profit of about 2.8 billion dollars last year alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not for bashing MNCs, but the example of Tata Motors and GM is not at all helpful. In FY04 Tata Motors total sales were Rs. 13000 crores or about 3 billion USD. AY 2004 sales for GM were about 193 billion dollars. GM tuned a profit of about 2.8 billion dollars last year alone.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: libra</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/05/13/dinosaurs-were-big-too/#comment-3489</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/05/13/dinosaurs-were-big-too/#comment-3489</guid>
					<description>When the government introduced FDI in print, the Times of India group opposed it tooth and nail. Swaminthan Aiyar, long a Times employee, argued in support of Times. FDI in every other sector is good but not where it might possibly end his (erstwhile) employer's near-monopoly-like domination? That is sheer hypocrisy and it is people like Aiyar who are giving capitalism a bad name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the government introduced FDI in print, the Times of India group opposed it tooth and nail. Swaminthan Aiyar, long a Times employee, argued in support of Times. FDI in every other sector is good but not where it might possibly end his (erstwhile) employer&#8217;s near-monopoly-like domination? That is sheer hypocrisy and it is people like Aiyar who are giving capitalism a bad name.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: harini calamur</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/05/13/dinosaurs-were-big-too/#comment-3490</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/05/13/dinosaurs-were-big-too/#comment-3490</guid>
					<description>And dodo's were small:) 
Not all big companies fail, not all small companies succeed.  
I guess that Indian manufacturers have it lucky that we have such a large internal market place. international competition as such has only really hit the upper and middle income segments. 
check out Blade Runner - there were around  10 top brands of that time featured in the film. All these brands were international giants. Of them only coca cola survives:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And dodo&#8217;s were small:)<br />
Not all big companies fail, not all small companies succeed.<br />
I guess that Indian manufacturers have it lucky that we have such a large internal market place. international competition as such has only really hit the upper and middle income segments.<br />
check out Blade Runner - there were around  10 top brands of that time featured in the film. All these brands were international giants. Of them only coca cola survives:)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anton Sherwood</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/05/13/dinosaurs-were-big-too/#comment-3491</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/05/13/dinosaurs-were-big-too/#comment-3491</guid>
					<description>The phrase &quot;what's good for General Motors is good for America&quot; is famous because it was uttered by a Cabinet member who had previously worked for GM; I wouldn't describe it as a &quot;popular slogan&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The phrase &#8220;what&#8217;s good for General Motors is good for America&#8221; is famous because it was uttered by a Cabinet member who had previously worked for GM; I wouldn&#8217;t describe it as a &#8220;popular slogan&#8221;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: MadMan</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/05/13/dinosaurs-were-big-too/#comment-3492</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/05/13/dinosaurs-were-big-too/#comment-3492</guid>
					<description>If Aiyar argued against FDI in print, then my respect for him just dropped a few points. 

&lt;i&gt;Of them only coca cola survives&lt;/i&gt;

To extend Harini's point, most of the brands mentioned in Tom Peters' famous book, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0060548789/ref=ase_anarcaplib-20/104-1012730-7488729?v=glance&amp;s=books&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;In Search Of Excellence&lt;/a&gt;, have also suffered serious reversals in their fortunes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Aiyar argued against FDI in print, then my respect for him just dropped a few points. </p>
<p><i>Of them only coca cola survives</i></p>
<p>To extend Harini&#8217;s point, most of the brands mentioned in Tom Peters&#8217; famous book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0060548789/ref=ase_anarcaplib-20/104-1012730-7488729?v=glance&#038;s=books" rel="nofollow">In Search Of Excellence</a>, have also suffered serious reversals in their fortunes.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mahesh Vee</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/05/13/dinosaurs-were-big-too/#comment-3493</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/05/13/dinosaurs-were-big-too/#comment-3493</guid>
					<description>Mr. Aiyer,
How about a GM/FORD Vs Small company in the US comparison? 
A lot more in that argument has to do with globalization, Asia uprising, innovation, etc. Also, anybody here in the States would agree that the likes of GM,Microsoft,FORD,Goldman Sachs have a lot of clout in the White House!! A very THIN argument by Mr. Aiyer.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Aiyer,<br />
How about a GM/FORD Vs Small company in the US comparison?<br />
A lot more in that argument has to do with globalization, Asia uprising, innovation, etc. Also, anybody here in the States would agree that the likes of GM,Microsoft,FORD,Goldman Sachs have a lot of clout in the White House!! A very THIN argument by Mr. Aiyer.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
