Comments on: Tendulkar, Gandhi and Yuvak Biradari http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/02/04/tendulkar-gandhi-and-yuvak-biradari/ Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:53:07 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1 by: satyanarayan pande http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/02/04/tendulkar-gandhi-and-yuvak-biradari/#comment-8090 Thu, 20 Apr 2006 02:19:31 +0000 http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/02/04/tendulkar-gandhi-and-yuvak-biradari/#comment-8090 i appriciate the approach towards humanism(manavatavad),please keep up and make this world better than we find it. i appriciate the approach towards humanism(manavatavad),please keep up and make this world better than we find it.

]]> by: whocarez http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/02/04/tendulkar-gandhi-and-yuvak-biradari/#comment-2989 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/02/04/tendulkar-gandhi-and-yuvak-biradari/#comment-2989 Damages need to be tangible. So, u mean to say that a wife being emotionally tortured by her husband should have no laws to turn to, simply because she cant show any tangible damages. She cant ask for compensation for the emotional trauma she might have been forced to undergo. I mean, C'mon there are umpteen such cases where there are no visible damages, but the case demands compensation. And least of all, would u condone all sorts of slanderous writings in journalism, which is happenning anyway, under the adage of "freedom of speech"?? Damages need to be tangible. So, u mean to say that a wife being emotionally tortured by her husband should have no laws to turn to, simply because she cant show any tangible damages. She cant ask for compensation for the emotional trauma she might have been forced to undergo. I mean, C’mon there are umpteen such cases where there are no visible damages, but the case demands compensation. And least of all, would u condone all sorts of slanderous writings in journalism, which is happenning anyway, under the adage of “freedom of speech”??

]]> by: whocarez http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/02/04/tendulkar-gandhi-and-yuvak-biradari/#comment-2990 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/02/04/tendulkar-gandhi-and-yuvak-biradari/#comment-2990 Damages need to be tangible. So, u mean to say that a wife being emotionally tortured by her husband should have no laws to turn to, simply because she cant show any tangible damages. She cant ask for compensation for the emotional trauma she might have been forced to undergo. I mean, C'mon there are umpteen such cases where there are no visible damages, but the case demands compensation. And least of all, would u condone all sorts of slanderous writings in journalism, which is happenning anyway, under the adage of "freedom of speech"?? Damages need to be tangible. So, u mean to say that a wife being emotionally tortured by her husband should have no laws to turn to, simply because she cant show any tangible damages. She cant ask for compensation for the emotional trauma she might have been forced to undergo. I mean, C’mon there are umpteen such cases where there are no visible damages, but the case demands compensation. And least of all, would u condone all sorts of slanderous writings in journalism, which is happenning anyway, under the adage of “freedom of speech”??

]]> by: MadMan http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/02/04/tendulkar-gandhi-and-yuvak-biradari/#comment-2991 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/02/04/tendulkar-gandhi-and-yuvak-biradari/#comment-2991 Nitpick: <i>And least of all, would u condone all sorts of slanderous writings in journalism</i> If it's in written form, it's called "libel", not "slander". <i>a wife being emotionally tortured by her husband should have no laws to turn to</i> Well, she has the option of divorce, but beyond that, I don't think there are any laws protecting her from her husband shouting at her, for instance. (But if he hits her, a criminal case can be filed against him.) That "emotional torture" is a very slippery slope, my friend. Tell us what law you would propose and against what kind of "torture". Nitpick:

And least of all, would u condone all sorts of slanderous writings in journalism

If it’s in written form, it’s called “libel”, not “slander”.

a wife being emotionally tortured by her husband should have no laws to turn to

Well, she has the option of divorce, but beyond that, I don’t think there are any laws protecting her from her husband shouting at her, for instance. (But if he hits her, a criminal case can be filed against him.)

That “emotional torture” is a very slippery slope, my friend. Tell us what law you would propose and against what kind of “torture”.

]]> by: Nerve Endings Firing Away http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/02/04/tendulkar-gandhi-and-yuvak-biradari/#comment-2992 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.yazadjal.com/2005/02/04/tendulkar-gandhi-and-yuvak-biradari/#comment-2992 <strong>Bharteeya Blog Mela</strong> Welcome, well-directed Instapundit readers, mis-directed Google readers, and of course my regular NEFA readers. Without much ado, I present the spicy-n-hot Bharteeya Blog Mela. Every one of our five senses has a billion dollar artsy industry attached t... Bharteeya Blog Mela

Welcome, well-directed Instapundit readers, mis-directed Google readers, and of course my regular NEFA readers. Without much ado, I present the spicy-n-hot Bharteeya Blog Mela. Every one of our five senses has a billion dollar artsy industry attached t…

]]>