<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Superman and life</title>
	<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/10/11/superman-and-life/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Amol Hatwar</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/10/11/superman-and-life/#comment-2144</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/10/11/superman-and-life/#comment-2144</guid>
					<description>Yes, yazad... it is sad. The Superman series were the first foreign films I watched.

The right to choose to end one's life makes sense to me now. But it isn't right constitutionally. Think: &quot;You can't take things that aren't yours away from yourself.&quot;

Plus, even if the right to choose to die is granted, how can people be protected from potential misuse?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, yazad&#8230; it is sad. The Superman series were the first foreign films I watched.</p>
<p>The right to choose to end one&#8217;s life makes sense to me now. But it isn&#8217;t right constitutionally. Think: &#8220;You can&#8217;t take things that aren&#8217;t yours away from yourself.&#8221;</p>
<p>Plus, even if the right to choose to die is granted, how can people be protected from potential misuse?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Yazad</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/10/11/superman-and-life/#comment-2145</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/10/11/superman-and-life/#comment-2145</guid>
					<description>The &quot;potential misuse&quot; argument is classic paternalism. We should not allow people to buy and sell, think of the potential misuse. Of course you'd find cheats and frauds. Does not mean you stop business. 

In the case of life and euthanasia, it is much tougher, I agree. It is still not a paradigm shift. Just an increase in magnitude. 

There is a problem with crying &quot;constitution&quot; all the time. However fine, the damn document was not signed by all of us who are supposed to be under it's purview. Plus it's changed rather often. E.g. I will never sign a document that proclaims that India is a &lt;i&gt;socialist&lt;/i&gt; republic. But hey, that's what the constitution says right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;potential misuse&#8221; argument is classic paternalism. We should not allow people to buy and sell, think of the potential misuse. Of course you&#8217;d find cheats and frauds. Does not mean you stop business. </p>
<p>In the case of life and euthanasia, it is much tougher, I agree. It is still not a paradigm shift. Just an increase in magnitude. </p>
<p>There is a problem with crying &#8220;constitution&#8221; all the time. However fine, the damn document was not signed by all of us who are supposed to be under it&#8217;s purview. Plus it&#8217;s changed rather often. E.g. I will never sign a document that proclaims that India is a <i>socialist</i> republic. But hey, that&#8217;s what the constitution says right now.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ravikiran Rao</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/10/11/superman-and-life/#comment-2146</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/10/11/superman-and-life/#comment-2146</guid>
					<description>No the only potential misuse problem comes when you have to pull the plug on a terminally ill patient who is incapacitated and cannot give consent and also who hasn't left a living will. 

In such a case, the same standards that aare applicable while deciding whether a doctor has been negligient or not can be applied in the court.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No the only potential misuse problem comes when you have to pull the plug on a terminally ill patient who is incapacitated and cannot give consent and also who hasn&#8217;t left a living will. </p>
<p>In such a case, the same standards that aare applicable while deciding whether a doctor has been negligient or not can be applied in the court.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: MadMan</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/10/11/superman-and-life/#comment-2147</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/10/11/superman-and-life/#comment-2147</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;Think: &quot;You can't take things that aren't yours away from yourself.&quot;
&lt;/i&gt;

What exactly do you mean, Amol? One's life is own's own, is it not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Think: &#8220;You can&#8217;t take things that aren&#8217;t yours away from yourself.&#8221;<br />
</i></p>
<p>What exactly do you mean, Amol? One&#8217;s life is own&#8217;s own, is it not?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Amol Hatwar</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/10/11/superman-and-life/#comment-2148</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/10/11/superman-and-life/#comment-2148</guid>
					<description>True, everyone reserves the freedom of choosing how to lead his/her life. But &quot;owning&quot; and &quot;leading&quot; are seperate concepts.

You can only &quot;own&quot; what you can give yourself. Shirts, houses, cars and even money are things that somewhat qualify here. I use somewhat here because they won't ultimately belong to you... Try not paying taxes and see who assumes ownership :). On the other hand, intangible stuff like knowledge and experience are truly yours...

Coming back to life and ownership... Your life is given/gifted/entrusted to you by your parents. Though you are free to use it in any manner you choose, doesn't directly imply that you own it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, everyone reserves the freedom of choosing how to lead his/her life. But &#8220;owning&#8221; and &#8220;leading&#8221; are seperate concepts.</p>
<p>You can only &#8220;own&#8221; what you can give yourself. Shirts, houses, cars and even money are things that somewhat qualify here. I use somewhat here because they won&#8217;t ultimately belong to you&#8230; Try not paying taxes and see who assumes ownership :). On the other hand, intangible stuff like knowledge and experience are truly yours&#8230;</p>
<p>Coming back to life and ownership&#8230; Your life is given/gifted/entrusted to you by your parents. Though you are free to use it in any manner you choose, doesn&#8217;t directly imply that you own it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ravikiran Rao</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/10/11/superman-and-life/#comment-2149</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/10/11/superman-and-life/#comment-2149</guid>
					<description>So are you saying that your parents should have the right to kill you when they want?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So are you saying that your parents should have the right to kill you when they want?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Yazad</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/10/11/superman-and-life/#comment-2150</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/10/11/superman-and-life/#comment-2150</guid>
					<description>Amol, let me grant you that life is a &quot;gift&quot; from parents / god / whoever. Now when A gives B a gift whose does the gift belong to? A or B? 

If I was given a gift, I think I own it. It might be crass and ungrateful to destroy that gift, but by all means my right to do so because it is mine. The same hold for the gift of a toy your parents gave you to the gift of life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amol, let me grant you that life is a &#8220;gift&#8221; from parents / god / whoever. Now when A gives B a gift whose does the gift belong to? A or B? </p>
<p>If I was given a gift, I think I own it. It might be crass and ungrateful to destroy that gift, but by all means my right to do so because it is mine. The same hold for the gift of a toy your parents gave you to the gift of life.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Amol Hatwar</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/10/11/superman-and-life/#comment-2151</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/10/11/superman-and-life/#comment-2151</guid>
					<description>Somehow, I knew you'd ask this. Here's what I think...

Amol gives Yazad a toy on his birthday. A few years later, Yazad gets mad at Amol and smashes the toy to smithereens. Amol is hurt... but thats OK; the toy &quot;can&quot; be replaced.

Can you replace someone's life? I don't    think gifts of mass-produced, perishable but replaceable goods come anywhere near the same ballpark as the gift of life!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow, I knew you&#8217;d ask this. Here&#8217;s what I think&#8230;</p>
<p>Amol gives Yazad a toy on his birthday. A few years later, Yazad gets mad at Amol and smashes the toy to smithereens. Amol is hurt&#8230; but thats OK; the toy &#8220;can&#8221; be replaced.</p>
<p>Can you replace someone&#8217;s life? I don&#8217;t    think gifts of mass-produced, perishable but replaceable goods come anywhere near the same ballpark as the gift of life!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Amol Hatwar</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/10/11/superman-and-life/#comment-2152</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/10/11/superman-and-life/#comment-2152</guid>
					<description>Ravikiran, man you're always fast :o)

What lead you to think your parent's gift to you by the act of conception warrants them your life's ownership?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ravikiran, man you&#8217;re always fast :o)</p>
<p>What lead you to think your parent&#8217;s gift to you by the act of conception warrants them your life&#8217;s ownership?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Yazad</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/10/11/superman-and-life/#comment-2153</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/10/11/superman-and-life/#comment-2153</guid>
					<description>Amol, there are many gifts that are irreplacable -- heirlooms for one. Plus, you proposed the gift analogy. Now what you're doing is &quot;shifting the goalpost.&quot;

I think life is an inalienable right. My life is mine and mine alone to do what I please with it -- achieve Mt. Everest or end it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amol, there are many gifts that are irreplacable &#8212; heirlooms for one. Plus, you proposed the gift analogy. Now what you&#8217;re doing is &#8220;shifting the goalpost.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think life is an inalienable right. My life is mine and mine alone to do what I please with it &#8212; achieve Mt. Everest or end it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
