<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More trash from Tavleen</title>
	<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/05/21/more-trash-from-tavleen/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Harini</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/05/21/more-trash-from-tavleen/#comment-1200</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/05/21/more-trash-from-tavleen/#comment-1200</guid>
					<description>the only paper that carried that story was the Pioneer. the pioneer, if i am not mistaken, is the English equivalent of Panchajanya. They both are the RSS mouth piece. 
i don't think that they printed the retraction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the only paper that carried that story was the Pioneer. the pioneer, if i am not mistaken, is the English equivalent of Panchajanya. They both are the RSS mouth piece.<br />
i don&#8217;t think that they printed the retraction.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Yazad</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/05/21/more-trash-from-tavleen/#comment-1201</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/05/21/more-trash-from-tavleen/#comment-1201</guid>
					<description>The Asian Age carried it. So did rediff.com Rediff published a retraction. I don't read Asian Age regularly, so I don't know if they did. Many other media outlets must have also carried the story. That is immaterial. 

Tavleen Singh could have easily double checked. Rashtrapati Bhavan under APJ Abdul Kalam is much more open than earlier. Plus the press release leaves nothing to the imagination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Asian Age carried it. So did rediff.com Rediff published a retraction. I don&#8217;t read Asian Age regularly, so I don&#8217;t know if they did. Many other media outlets must have also carried the story. That is immaterial. </p>
<p>Tavleen Singh could have easily double checked. Rashtrapati Bhavan under APJ Abdul Kalam is much more open than earlier. Plus the press release leaves nothing to the imagination.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: indian</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/05/21/more-trash-from-tavleen/#comment-1202</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/05/21/more-trash-from-tavleen/#comment-1202</guid>
					<description>Please don't be naive &amp; fooled by Press Release. 
Sonia's so called inner voice asked her to back off is just another shrewd ploy to play martyr which has not only saved her from humiliation she would face, for she was to be thrown out today or tomorrow but will also come in handy for her kids. President is downplaying the issue, &amp; rightly so for he probably does not want to add fuel to fire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please don&#8217;t be naive &#038; fooled by Press Release.<br />
Sonia&#8217;s so called inner voice asked her to back off is just another shrewd ploy to play martyr which has not only saved her from humiliation she would face, for she was to be thrown out today or tomorrow but will also come in handy for her kids. President is downplaying the issue, &#038; rightly so for he probably does not want to add fuel to fire.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Das</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/05/21/more-trash-from-tavleen/#comment-1203</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/05/21/more-trash-from-tavleen/#comment-1203</guid>
					<description>So ... don't believe the Press Release; believe &quot;Pioneer&quot;? Riiight. 

I wonder which is more naive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So &#8230; don&#8217;t believe the Press Release; believe &#8220;Pioneer&#8221;? Riiight. </p>
<p>I wonder which is more naive.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gaurav</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/05/21/more-trash-from-tavleen/#comment-1204</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/05/21/more-trash-from-tavleen/#comment-1204</guid>
					<description>When did A B Bardhan become C P Bardhan, one must ask tavleen. Maybe after he forgot the A and B of logic and joined the C P of India. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When did A B Bardhan become C P Bardhan, one must ask tavleen. Maybe after he forgot the A and B of logic and joined the C P of India. :)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Yazad</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/05/21/more-trash-from-tavleen/#comment-1205</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/05/21/more-trash-from-tavleen/#comment-1205</guid>
					<description>Gaurav, that could be a typo at the newspaper's end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gaurav, that could be a typo at the newspaper&#8217;s end.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Suhit Anantula</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/05/21/more-trash-from-tavleen/#comment-1206</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/05/21/more-trash-from-tavleen/#comment-1206</guid>
					<description>I personally believe that if there was a suggestion from the President, which most likely seems so, we cannot expect the Rashtrapathi Bhavan to inform the public about it.

This is the only way Sonia Gandhi can provide an explanation for her decision. 

I think the stock market crash is more related to the left's participation in the government than Sonia Gandhi. But there is definitely a sonia element in it. 

The rise of the market clearly shows that the investors and gamblers accepted Sonia Gandhi's choice of Manmohan Singh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally believe that if there was a suggestion from the President, which most likely seems so, we cannot expect the Rashtrapathi Bhavan to inform the public about it.</p>
<p>This is the only way Sonia Gandhi can provide an explanation for her decision. </p>
<p>I think the stock market crash is more related to the left&#8217;s participation in the government than Sonia Gandhi. But there is definitely a sonia element in it. </p>
<p>The rise of the market clearly shows that the investors and gamblers accepted Sonia Gandhi&#8217;s choice of Manmohan Singh.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Yazad</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/05/21/more-trash-from-tavleen/#comment-1207</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/05/21/more-trash-from-tavleen/#comment-1207</guid>
					<description>Suhit, this is true: 

&lt;i&gt;I personally believe that if there was a suggestion from the President, (snip), we cannot expect the Rashtrapathi Bhavan to inform the public about it.&lt;/i&gt;

But Rashtrapati Bhavan did not keep quiet. If it did, I would have belived the rumour. It actually took the &lt;i&gt;unlikely&lt;/i&gt; step of issuing a denial. To doubt that denial is to implicitly say that Dr. Kalam is lying. I will not go that far.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suhit, this is true: </p>
<p><i>I personally believe that if there was a suggestion from the President, (snip), we cannot expect the Rashtrapathi Bhavan to inform the public about it.</i></p>
<p>But Rashtrapati Bhavan did not keep quiet. If it did, I would have belived the rumour. It actually took the <i>unlikely</i> step of issuing a denial. To doubt that denial is to implicitly say that Dr. Kalam is lying. I will not go that far.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
