<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two books and a scientific rationale for Woman&#8217;s fickleness</title>
	<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/04/08/two-books-and-a-scientific-rationale-for-womans-fickleness/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Ramnath</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/04/08/two-books-and-a-scientific-rationale-for-womans-fickleness/#comment-946</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/04/08/two-books-and-a-scientific-rationale-for-womans-fickleness/#comment-946</guid>
					<description>Any reason for categorizing this under Art/ literature instead of science?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any reason for categorizing this under Art/ literature instead of science?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: MadMan</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/04/08/two-books-and-a-scientific-rationale-for-womans-fickleness/#comment-947</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/04/08/two-books-and-a-scientific-rationale-for-womans-fickleness/#comment-947</guid>
					<description>The Blind Watchmaker is an excellent book</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Blind Watchmaker is an excellent book
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ravikiran</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/04/08/two-books-and-a-scientific-rationale-for-womans-fickleness/#comment-948</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/04/08/two-books-and-a-scientific-rationale-for-womans-fickleness/#comment-948</guid>
					<description>Ramnath, that is because Yazad hasn't created a category called science and I was too lazy to go and create one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ramnath, that is because Yazad hasn&#8217;t created a category called science and I was too lazy to go and create one.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Yazad</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/04/08/two-books-and-a-scientific-rationale-for-womans-fickleness/#comment-949</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/04/08/two-books-and-a-scientific-rationale-for-womans-fickleness/#comment-949</guid>
					<description>Stop blaming me for your laziness. Creating a new category is a simple operation!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stop blaming me for your laziness. Creating a new category is a simple operation!!!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: MadMan</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/04/08/two-books-and-a-scientific-rationale-for-womans-fickleness/#comment-950</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/04/08/two-books-and-a-scientific-rationale-for-womans-fickleness/#comment-950</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;Creating a new category is a simple operation&lt;/i&gt;

Indeed it is.

And God said, &quot;let there be a science category&quot;, and there was a science category.

I've also changed the category of your post in anticipation of future sloth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Creating a new category is a simple operation</i></p>
<p>Indeed it is.</p>
<p>And God said, &#8220;let there be a science category&#8221;, and there was a science category.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also changed the category of your post in anticipation of future sloth.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Aadisht Khanna</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/04/08/two-books-and-a-scientific-rationale-for-womans-fickleness/#comment-951</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/04/08/two-books-and-a-scientific-rationale-for-womans-fickleness/#comment-951</guid>
					<description>Are you referring to the chapter on sexual selection, with the example on how a preference for long tails is reducing the whatsitname-bird's ability to fly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you referring to the chapter on sexual selection, with the example on how a preference for long tails is reducing the whatsitname-bird&#8217;s ability to fly?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ravikiran</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/04/08/two-books-and-a-scientific-rationale-for-womans-fickleness/#comment-952</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/04/08/two-books-and-a-scientific-rationale-for-womans-fickleness/#comment-952</guid>
					<description>Yes of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes of course.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kingsley</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/04/08/two-books-and-a-scientific-rationale-for-womans-fickleness/#comment-953</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/04/08/two-books-and-a-scientific-rationale-for-womans-fickleness/#comment-953</guid>
					<description>I can't believe this is the first time you guys are posting science. Shame shame puppy shame!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe this is the first time you guys are posting science. Shame shame puppy shame!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Yazad</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/04/08/two-books-and-a-scientific-rationale-for-womans-fickleness/#comment-954</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/04/08/two-books-and-a-scientific-rationale-for-womans-fickleness/#comment-954</guid>
					<description>Actually not. This is the first time the science category has been created.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually not. This is the first time the science category has been created.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ankh</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/04/08/two-books-and-a-scientific-rationale-for-womans-fickleness/#comment-955</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2004/04/08/two-books-and-a-scientific-rationale-for-womans-fickleness/#comment-955</guid>
					<description>The dearth of a science category is probably a reason why India is not shining... ditto on the oozability guy's comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dearth of a science category is probably a reason why India is not shining&#8230; ditto on the oozability guy&#8217;s comments.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
