Economic Chauvinism
Published by Ravikiran Rao January 16th, 2004 in EconomicsIn a very readable article published in the American Economic Review (way back in 1998), Ronald Coase outlines the problems with the way that Economists do Economics.
He seems too fall back on Marshall’s old self-critique:
“the Mecca of the economist lies in economic biology rather than in economic dynamics.”
But what amused me about Coase’ piece, were these two quotes:
What this comes down to is that economists think of themselves as having a box of tools but no subject matter. It reminds me of two lines from a modern poet (I forget the poem and the poet but the lines are indeed memorable):
I see the bridle and the bit all right
But where’s the bloody horse?
The modern poet refered to is Ronald Knox
And he ends the article with:
This change [to the ways of New Instituitional Economics] will not come about, in my view, as a result of a frontal assault on mainstream economics. It will come as a result of economists in branches or subsections of economics adopting a different approach, as indeed is already happening. When the majority of economists have changed, mainstream economists will acknowledge the importance of examining the economic system in this way and will claim that they knew it all along.
Emphasis added in both quotes
I found this article via Cláudio Djissey Shikida’s site “The Dark Side of Force>
Utterly irrelevant and stupid and tones down the tone of the blog but I will make it anyway - Nice coincidence - Ronald Coase and Ronald Knoxi.
Also, one little quote on economists = “They are the people who will know tommorow why what they predicted yesterday didnt happen today”
And this one too - “If you put all the economists in the world in a line, they wouldnt reach a conclusion”
Thanks for quoting my page about the dark side.
Hope to hear from you soon.
And what a nice blog this is…..yeah!