<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Department of unintentional irony</title>
	<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2003/12/01/department-of-unintentional-irony/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Jivha</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2003/12/01/department-of-unintentional-irony/#comment-359</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2003/12/01/department-of-unintentional-irony/#comment-359</guid>
					<description>No, my post does not say that Sonia Gandhi should be eligible for PM because Uma Bharati is eligible for CM.

Nowhere in my post have I justified Sonia Gandhi being considered for PM(although a regular reader may derive that from my blog, but this post, per se, does not say that). So your starting premise is wrong, and is a conclusion that you have derived yourself.

And quite predictably, I see no answers to the main question...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, my post does not say that Sonia Gandhi should be eligible for PM because Uma Bharati is eligible for CM.</p>
<p>Nowhere in my post have I justified Sonia Gandhi being considered for PM(although a regular reader may derive that from my blog, but this post, per se, does not say that). So your starting premise is wrong, and is a conclusion that you have derived yourself.</p>
<p>And quite predictably, I see no answers to the main question&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gautam</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2003/12/01/department-of-unintentional-irony/#comment-360</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2003/12/01/department-of-unintentional-irony/#comment-360</guid>
					<description>If you have a popular democracy, the only qualification a leader needs is that he/she be popular. That is the alpha and the omega of the qualifications that are needed. Or so I humbly propose.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have a popular democracy, the only qualification a leader needs is that he/she be popular. That is the alpha and the omega of the qualifications that are needed. Or so I humbly propose.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
