<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Uniform Civil Code?</title>
	<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2003/08/05/uniform-civil-code/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Sampada</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2003/08/05/uniform-civil-code/#comment-90</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2003/08/05/uniform-civil-code/#comment-90</guid>
					<description>Wow Ravikiran...Apna hi ghar samjho...you're very welcome here. ;-)

This is becoming quiet a party, Yaz's blog!! Neat :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow Ravikiran&#8230;Apna hi ghar samjho&#8230;you&#8217;re very welcome here. ;-)</p>
<p>This is becoming quiet a party, Yaz&#8217;s blog!! Neat :-)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Shanti</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2003/08/05/uniform-civil-code/#comment-91</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2003/08/05/uniform-civil-code/#comment-91</guid>
					<description>Ravi, first you plan to overthrow Yaz's &quot;regime&quot; and now you take over his blog - what next?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ravi, first you plan to overthrow Yaz&#8217;s &#8220;regime&#8221; and now you take over his blog - what next?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nandan Pandit</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2003/08/05/uniform-civil-code/#comment-92</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2003/08/05/uniform-civil-code/#comment-92</guid>
					<description>hi Ravi (Hi Yazad!nice blog!I do read it often and like doing so!)

Nice case...the whole problem is, nobody seems to be sure on the exact extent of the UCC. this could be a blessing, since a national level debate can take place and the extent can be decided so that specific customs can be respected and given their place. 
Possibly, we can have a system similar to the Roman Law, where redress was available under either the Law of the Land of the conquered territories or the Roman Law mechanism.But the difference would be, we would be extending it even to the personal issues, which, as far as I know, was not the case under the Roman system. On the other hand, I feel we have politically and socially progressed since the Roman times and this might be possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Ravi (Hi Yazad!nice blog!I do read it often and like doing so!)</p>
<p>Nice case&#8230;the whole problem is, nobody seems to be sure on the exact extent of the UCC. this could be a blessing, since a national level debate can take place and the extent can be decided so that specific customs can be respected and given their place.<br />
Possibly, we can have a system similar to the Roman Law, where redress was available under either the Law of the Land of the conquered territories or the Roman Law mechanism.But the difference would be, we would be extending it even to the personal issues, which, as far as I know, was not the case under the Roman system. On the other hand, I feel we have politically and socially progressed since the Roman times and this might be possible.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Yazad</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2003/08/05/uniform-civil-code/#comment-93</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2003/08/05/uniform-civil-code/#comment-93</guid>
					<description>Welcome Ravi. 

I fully agree. (And needless to say, very happy that someone else sees the point of view I had briefly mentioned &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.madhoo.com/archives/002507.php#001584&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;). I think that contract law and the law of torts should be able to handle personal issues as well. Incidentally, some sort of a &quot;common code&quot; already exists. E.g. The Special Marriage Act. I know of friends who are married under it although both are Hindus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome Ravi. </p>
<p>I fully agree. (And needless to say, very happy that someone else sees the point of view I had briefly mentioned <a href="http://www.madhoo.com/archives/002507.php#001584" rel="nofollow">here</a>). I think that contract law and the law of torts should be able to handle personal issues as well. Incidentally, some sort of a &#8220;common code&#8221; already exists. E.g. The Special Marriage Act. I know of friends who are married under it although both are Hindus.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mahesh Shantaram</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2003/08/05/uniform-civil-code/#comment-94</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2003/08/05/uniform-civil-code/#comment-94</guid>
					<description>Aaaarrrgghh! Can it be true? Has Yazad snared our hero (Ravi) in his Jal? What sinister designs is he cooking in his CrapLab? Stay tuned to find out...

And on a more serious note, I never knew of a Special Marriage Act. Sounds like my kind of thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaaarrrgghh! Can it be true? Has Yazad snared our hero (Ravi) in his Jal? What sinister designs is he cooking in his CrapLab? Stay tuned to find out&#8230;</p>
<p>And on a more serious note, I never knew of a Special Marriage Act. Sounds like my kind of thing.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Shanti</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2003/08/05/uniform-civil-code/#comment-95</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2003/08/05/uniform-civil-code/#comment-95</guid>
					<description>Ravi, is your &quot;pun&quot;itis that secret biological weapon that you threatened to infect the world with? Looks like you have leaked the contents a bit and managed to infect Gaurav and Mahesh :0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ravi, is your &#8220;pun&#8221;itis that secret biological weapon that you threatened to infect the world with? Looks like you have leaked the contents a bit and managed to infect Gaurav and Mahesh :0
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ravikiran</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2003/08/05/uniform-civil-code/#comment-96</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2003/08/05/uniform-civil-code/#comment-96</guid>
					<description>Mahesh, now look what you have done. You have started something which promises to be even more devastating than my SARS series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mahesh, now look what you have done. You have started something which promises to be even more devastating than my SARS series.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Shanti</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2003/08/05/uniform-civil-code/#comment-97</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2003/08/05/uniform-civil-code/#comment-97</guid>
					<description>True sign of a seasoned politician - blame the &quot;victims&quot; of conspiracy you have started ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True sign of a seasoned politician - blame the &#8220;victims&#8221; of conspiracy you have started ;)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gaurav</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2003/08/05/uniform-civil-code/#comment-98</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2003/08/05/uniform-civil-code/#comment-98</guid>
					<description>I have not quite sorted out what I feel about UCC. Though your argument is sound, somewhere I sense a flaw that I can't quite detect at first attempt. Thinking....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not quite sorted out what I feel about UCC. Though your argument is sound, somewhere I sense a flaw that I can&#8217;t quite detect at first attempt. Thinking&#8230;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ravikiran Rao</title>
		<link>http://www.yazadjal.com/2003/08/05/uniform-civil-code/#comment-99</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.yazadjal.com/2003/08/05/uniform-civil-code/#comment-99</guid>
					<description>Yup there is a subtle flaw :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup there is a subtle flaw :)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
